1000 ポンド。シスターズのスターエイミー・ スラトンは、休日の週末にテネシー州の動物園で逮捕されました。
地元の動物園でラクダに噛まれたゲストに対処するためのクロケット郡保安官局の戦略について説明しているようですが、到着するとすぐに、ゲストの車から発せられる不審な臭いに圧倒されました。
このセリフは、ポスト、スラトン、乗り物に言及した巧みな言葉遊びです。このラインは、スケジュール I、スケジュール VI、および児童危険行為の 2 つの罪状を所持した容疑で逮捕されました。ブライアン・スコットという名前の男が法廷に出席し、警察が発表したのと同じ容疑で逮捕された。
This statement is commonly used in legal settings to emphasize the presumption of innocence, which is a crucial aspect of the case. The statement suggests that the charges and allegations are merely accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence, and implies that the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty through due process of law. This language is often used in legal contexts to highlight the importance of the presumption of innocence, which is a fundamental aspect of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is frequently used to illustrate the significance of the presumption of innocence, which forms an essential part of the case. The charges and allegations are referred to as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to underscore the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes a vital aspect of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used in legal contexts to emphasize the role of the presumption of innocence, which is an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is usually employed in legal contexts to underscore the significance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as a crucial aspect of the case. The charges and allegations are put forward as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often utilized in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which forms an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is frequently employed in legal contexts to emphasize the role of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes a vital aspect of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used in legal contexts to underscore the significance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are put forward as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes a vital part of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often utilized in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which forms an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is frequently used in legal contexts to emphasize the role of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes a vital aspect of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to underscore the significance of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential role in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which forms an essential part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often utilized in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is frequently used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes a vital aspect of the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which forms an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to underscore the significance of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential role in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often utilized in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is frequently used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which forms an essential part of the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to underscore the significance of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential role in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often utilized in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The charges and allegations are advanced as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is routinely used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which constitutes an integral part of the case. The charges and allegations are presented as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is regularly used to illustrate the importance of the presumption of innocence, which serves as an essential element of the case. The charges and allegations are framed as accusations of criminal conduct, not evidence; the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. This language is often employed in legal contexts to highlight the role of the presumption of innocence, which plays an essential part in the case. The presumption of innocence refers to the role as an essential element in a legal proceedings where the defendant is considered innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt and convicted through due process of law. The presumption of innocence serves as an essential element in the case by, which plays an essential part in the role of:
9 月 3 日火曜日、米国は、警察がキノコとマリファナと思われるものを所持しているのが発見された後、スラトンとロヴヴォルンがまだ拘留され、保釈審問を待っていることを確認した。広報担当官のスティーブン・ サットンによると、動物園の職員が911に通報し、スラトンがラクダに噛まれ、負傷の疑いでERに運ばれ、治療を受けた後に逮捕されたと報告した。
その瞬間、警官らは車内に違法薬物のようなものを明白に目撃したのではないかと疑った。これは、彼らが車両の捜索を行う正当な根拠を得るのに十分な理由でした。
クロケット紙によると、スラトンさんの息子であるゲイジ君（4歳）とグレン君（2歳）は、 彼女が元夫マイケル・ ホルターマンと共有しているが、逮捕時に彼女の車に同乗していたが、怪我はなかったという。郡保安官は私たちに対し、児童家族サービス省がこの事件に関与しているとも語った。
「両親を巻き込んだ計画が実行に移されており、現在も捜査が続いている」とPIO は私たちに語った。ゲージとグレンは、スラトンとロヴヴォルンの逮捕後、家族の保護下に釈放された。
エイミーは、2020年に初放送されたTLCの番組「1000ポンド・シスターズ」で妹のタミー・スラトンとともに人気を集めた。このシリーズでは、彼らの減量の旅の浮き沈みや、それが健康や個人にどのような影響を与えるかを追っている。経験。
エイミーとホルターマンのロマンチックな旅はテレビでも描かれています。彼らは2019年に結婚し、2人の子供の親となり、1人は2020年に、もう1人は2022年に生まれました。
2人目の子供の誕生から約1年後、ホルターマンは約4年の結婚生活を経てエイミーとの離婚を申請した。当社が入手した裁判所文書によると、ホルターマンは別居日を2023年2月24日と述べ、双方が互いの住居から500フィートの距離を保つよう裁判所に接近禁止命令を求めた。
ホルターマンによる接近禁止命令の申請には、彼とエイミーの両者がこの訴訟や互いについてのコメントや投稿をオンラインで公開することを禁じる条項も含まれていた。さらに、ホルターマンは、彼らが従うべき共有の子育て計画を提案しました。
2023年9月に、元配偶者によって正式に離婚が完了したと言われています。彼らは2人の子供を共同で監護する取り決めを決めた。
2023 年 2 月というスリリングな月に戻って、他ならぬエイミー自身が、熱心なファンである私たちに、ホルターマンとの生活についての親密な詳細を明かしてくれました。彼が離婚を申請する数カ月前、彼女はこれ以上子孫を残したいとは思っていないと率直に告白し、「私の家族は完全に揃っている！」と断言した。彼女自身の言葉を借りれば、「私は疲れを知らない母親として、子供たちが眠っている間はエネルギーを注ぎます。その時間は、当然のことながらお風呂に入ったり、個人的なことに気を配ったりする時間です。」
- PORT3 予想・見通し・の予想. PORT3 暗号通貨
- XAI 予想・見通し・の予想. XAI 暗号通貨
- アンブレラ・アカデミーのファン、「ひどい」最終シーズンと問題のあるロマンスに激怒 – Netflixの番組は「ゲーム・オブ・スローンズより悪い結末を作り上げた」と主張
- ジェナ・オルテガ、ついにメリッサ・バレラのスクリーム7解雇について語る、業界はあまりにも「敏感」すぎると語る
- 仮想通貨専門家、ビットコイン価格は2倍に設定されていると語る、その理由はここにある
- ポンプリアーノ、ブロックチェーン開発者とトークン保有者を支援する新たな事業を発表
- サム・バンクマン・フリード、FTX詐欺で懲役25年を控訴
- ウクライナはエネルギー容量の90％を失った – 元大臣
- ビットコインの需要急増：これは何を意味するのか？
- 香港SFC、3社による仮想資産詐欺に警告
2024-09-03 21:59